The investigative office of the Chief Department for Organized Crime Control of the Ministry of Internal Affairs dismissed the criminal case (opened on the 12th May 2010) against one of the famous Ukrainian businessmen.
The investigative office of the Chief Department for Organized Crime Control of the Ministry of Internal Affairs dismissed the criminal case (opened on the 12th May 2010) against one of the famous Ukrainian businessmen.
Dispute between the Contractor and the Customer was settled by successful recovery of funds. The problem of the recovery was that the Customer, who was a long-term defaulter to pay for the works, done by the Contractor, took all possible measures to withdraw the property and transfer it to the third parties.
The subject matter of the dispute is that indemnification is sought from an airline for the airline’s refusal to carry a child suffering from diabetes.
The subject matter of the dispute is that the supplier refused to perform a Supply Contract claiming that the product price changed.
The client of Attorney Cherezov & Partners was forced to purchase the products from third parties at a higher price than that provided by the contract with the original supplier.
The insurance company applied to Attorney Cherezov & Partners because, when executing a Life and Health Insurance Contract, one of its clients intentionally concealed a disease and, once contractual relations were duly formalized, immediately applied for insurance indemnity.
The Court of Appeals upheld the decision of the court of original jurisdiction to impose a sentence without imprisonment for a crime provided for by part 2 of Article 368 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.